For counselling
and psychotherapy
professionals
and psychotherapy
professionals
Latest issue:March 2010
Vol.21
Issue 2
Latest issue:
A selection of articles are freely available to aid your research, guide your practice or inform you about a broad range of therapy related subjects.
Search for articles by keyword or browse the archive.
A response to ‘To resist is to exist’ by Martin Kemp and Eliana Pinto |
| "The recent spate of correspondence over the publication in Therapy Today of ‘To resist is to exist’ by Martin Kemp and Eliana Pinto (March 2009) has raised the ire of many readers, despite the BACP statement that BACP ‘has no position or policy with regard to Middle East politics’" |
Trauma: the unreported casualty of war |
| "In the March issue of this journal, two psychotherapists wrote about the psychological impact of military occupation on the Palestinian people. In response, David Bedein reports from Sderot on the effects of Palestinian rocket fire on the city's residents" |
Palestine: to resist is to exist |
| "We have received an unprecedented amount of correspondence, both negative and positive, in reponse to last month's article 'To resist is to exist'. More of this can be read here (see 'related articles, right)" |
To resist is to exist |
| "Notes on the psychological impact of military occupation in Palestine" |
In their paper ‘To resist is to exist’ (Therapy Today, March 2009), Kemp and Pinto cite a case of a child becoming blind due to the psychological trauma attributed to reported demolition of her house. I note that her mother reportedly became ‘mute’. As an optometrist I am not in a position to comment on the psychoanalytical diagnoses regarding causes but I would ask that I be allowed to make some observations.
Email this to a friend 
Printable version
by
In their paper ‘To resist is to exist’ (Therapy Today, March 2009), Kemp and Pinto cite a case of a child becoming blind due to the psychological trauma attributed to reported demolition of her house. I note that her mother reportedly became ‘mute’. As an optometrist I am not in a position to comment on the psychoanalytical diagnoses regarding causes but I would ask that I be allowed to make some observations.
It is important to understand that determining the aetiology of psychosomatic visual anomalies is often complex and difficult. The literature describing visual anomalies of this nature (also termed Visual Conversion Reaction) in children would suggest that interpersonal relationship anomalies are the usual cause.1 Visual conversion reaction is four times more common in females with modal peaks of incidence in the 13 to 14 year-old age groups.2, 3, 4 There may be a pubertal association. When the visual anomaly is marked, for example severe loss of vision, the literature cites sexual or mental abuse carried out by the parent or neighbour.5,6,7
Without careful, impartial analysis carried out by an expert psychotherapist, it would be very easy to misdiagnose the aetiology or, if there was a political motive, to attribute the blame to a convenient ‘scapegoat’. I would suggest that even more care should be taken with patients who are from communities where confronting sexual abuse within families is even more taboo than usual.
In conclusion I would suggest that your readers treat with great caution the inclusion by Kemp and Pinto of this report. Further, it should be understood that if a misdiagnosis has been made in this instance or other cases, for whatever reason, any child may well be at ongoing risk from something more sinister than the cause attributed.
Simon Barnard PhD FCOptom, FAAO DipCL, DipClinOptom
Director of Ocular Medicine, Institute of Optometry, London
1. Barnard S. Psychosomatic visual anomalies. In Barnard S, Edgar D (eds) Pediatric eyecare. Blackwell Science; 1996.
2. Yasuna ER. Hysterical amblyopia in children. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1963; 106:68-73.
3. Mantyjarvi MI. The amblyopic schoolgirl syndrome. J. Paed. Ophthalmol. Strabismus. 1981; 18:30-33.
4. Rada RR, Meyer GG, Krill AE. Visual conversion reaction in children. I. Diagnosis. Psychosomatics. 1969; 10:23-28.
5. Wolpe ZS. Psychogenic visual disturbance in a four year old child. Nervous Dis. Child. 1953; 10:314.
6. Schlaegel TF. Psychosomatic ophthalmology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1957: 370.
7. Barnard NAS. Visual conversion reaction in children. Ophthalmol. Physiol. Opt. 1989: 371-378.
